Saturday, May 21, 2011

Ferris Wheel Shaped Cake

Characterizing the National Innovation System of Venezuela


cooperation networks / innovation / knowledge:
organizational arrangements for the experience, skills and attitudes to flow and produce products and services
tailored to the needs of each country and strengthening scientific independence technology, without neglecting
developments in the world!

Greetings innovative / entrepreneurial.

One of the key dimensions in the innovation process from the macro, is familiar with the various agencies and institutions of scientific and technological country. On this occasion, I present in summary form on:

National Endowment for Science, Technology and Innovation of Venezuela - FONACIT


instrument description: Its purpose is to finance the implementation of plans, programs and projects identified by the MPPCT, promote the scientific, technological and innovative, contributing to the country's social development.


CORPORATE RESPONSIBILITY

The FONACIT exercise responsible stewardship towards the realization of its institutional commitments to the National System of Science, Technology and Innovation and the country. COMMITMENT



The FONACIT be committed to the country, with the National System of Science, Technology and Innovation and its internal organization so as to guarantee the successful and efficient of all programs and projects and the consolidation and development of science and technology sector. EXCELLENCE



The FONACIT promote participation and development of talent within and outside the National System of Science, Technology and Innovation

PARTICIPATION AND TEAMWORK

The FONACIT encourage the participation of all stakeholders in the system National Science, Technology and Innovation in the implementation process projects and programs through the implementation of management and management styles tailored to specific situations and problems. EFFICIENCY


FONACIT
The organization will focus on the optimization and optimization of available resources.

sectoral or horizontal approach of the instrument: Horizontal

Beneficiaries: Teachers / Researchers: Universities: Research Centers: Corporations / Foundations: Local groups R + D + I: Scientific institutions and / or private technology nonprofit

Mechanism Type: Grant (grant fund)

Links Highlights: http://www.fonacit.gov.ve/


Greetings,

Monday, May 16, 2011

Audrey Hepburn Cigarette Holder Vintage

LEADERSHIP PROCESS BY Kouzes and Posner

Kousez (left) and Posner (der)
Years of research practice has been documented in his model:
The challenge of leadership

Then I copy short "expanded" from a leadership perspective based on the example, is one of its dimensions: as a model.
This model would be based on the premise: "By their works you will know them." More than once one has heard or has found that a fact is worth a thousand words. Taking
infoación directly from the authors in their original language, would be:

The Leadership Challenge Model

"Our research has That Are Revealed five common practices When Leaders Are Able to make extraordinary things happen. We call The Five Practices These of Exemplary Leadership ®. They are:

1.
Model the Way 2.
Inspire a Shared Vision 3.
Challenge the Process 4.
Enable Others to Act 5. Encourage the Heart

The Five Practices of Exemplary Leadership ® resulting from an intensive research project to determine the leadership competencies That Are Things essential to getting extraordinary done in organizations. To conduct the research, Jim Kouzes and Barry Posner collected thousands of "Personal Best" stories—the experiences people recalled when asked to think of a peak leadership experience.

Despite differences in people's individual stories, their Personal-Best Leadership Experiences revealed similar patterns of behavior. The study found that when leaders are at their personal best, they:

1.- Model the Way

Leaders establish principles concerning the way people (constituents, peers, colleagues, and customers alike) should be treated and the way goals should be pursued. They create standards of excellence and then set an example for others to follow. Because the prospect of complex change can overwhelm people and stifle action, they set interim goals so that people can achieve small wins as they work toward larger objectives. They unravel bureaucracy when it impedes action; they put up signposts when people are unsure of where to go or how to get there; and they create opportunities for victory.

2.- Inspire a Shared Vision

Leaders passionately believe that they can make a difference. They envision the future, creating an ideal and unique image of what the organization can become. Through their magnetism and quiet persuasion, leaders enlist others in their dreams. They breathe life into their visions and get people to see exciting possibilities for the future.

3.- Challenge the Process

Leaders search for opportunities to change the status quo. They look for innovative ways to improve the organization. In doing so, they experiment and take risks. And because leaders know that risk taking involves mistakes and failures, they accept the inevitable disappointments as learning opportunities.

4.- Enable Others to Act

Leaders foster collaboration and build spirited teams. They actively involve others. Leaders understand that mutual respect is what sustains extraordinary efforts; they strive to create an atmosphere of trust and human dignity. They strengthen others, making each person feel capable and powerful.

5.- Encourage the Heart

Accomplishing extraordinary things in organizations is hard work. To keep hope and determination alive, Leaders Recognize Contributions That individuos make. In Every winning team, the members Need to share in the rewards of Their Efforts, Leaders celebrate so Accomplishments. They make people feel like heroes. "

Source:
http://www.leadershipchallenge.com/WileyCDA/Section/id-131055.html


One suggestion from Innovargh Foundation is to see, or rather, to study the film: Invictus with actors Morgan Freeman and Matt Damon. However, the lenses to be placed are the dimensions that the authors have proposed for your model. To do this we let the following summary.

Aaahhh, incidentally, have a homemade instrument to measure or identify your leadership profile based on this approach. Just follow this bolg, write and swiftly, you will receive.

Here goes ...

Kouzes and Posner (2005) in their investigations, have shown that successful leadership process involves five practices which five practices which involve ten commitments, every commitment in turn, means developing some activities by the leaders.


1.-CHALLENGE THE PROCESS.

Kouzes and Posner (2005) argue that the main function of leaders is to lead their employees to places you've never been, through unexplored paths, should look for opportunities, their job is to alter the status quo, creating an unprecedented, beating the system, looking for opportunities to do what has never been done.

Commitment 1: Go out looking for opportunities to present the challenge to change and grow, innovate and improve.

This commitment involves three practices as Kouzes and Posner:

a) Raise intrinsic motivation: the challenge raises the intrinsic motivation, however, they should not be so great, so that is disappointing, leaders must be aware that people need to have success against the challenges.

For these authors, leaders must offer extrinsic rewards like money, stock, bonuses, prestige and position, however, must also have intrinsic motivation and learning, self-esteem, pride, competition and service, so you will good performance.

However, Kouzes and Posner (2005) state that employees must justify their jobs, not only by economic fundamentals and that will never contribute more than the minimum necessary and tend to feel isolated and leave the organization to get a better job salary. Thus external rewards can decrease intrinsic motivation creating a dependency on expensive systems of remuneration.

The authors argue that a key requirement for increasing intrinsic motivation is that the work involves challenges, such as designing and discover something new, explore an unknown place and solve a mathematical problem, etc. So say for leaders to perform at their fullest capabilities needed:

• Believing that the project requires use all the skills and talents.

• Experience the project itself rewarding, and challenging.

• Find and create opportunities for people to exceed themselves. • Find

occasions for people to solve problems, make discoveries, explore new territories, to achieve challenging goals or find ways to confront any external threat.

• Have work responsibilities become fun.

As Kouzes and Posner (2005) the task of leaders should be to balance the opportunities for action and individual skills, for it must know the capabilities of their poderantes, for that leaders must:

• Know what others can do.

• Recognize that others find it a challenge person.

mention The second practice Kouzes and Posner (2005) necessary to meet this commitment:

b) Balancing routines paradox: it is motivating for poderantes leaders and create a new way of life, the routine can be the enemy of change "eliminates all the routine work tasks not are routine and creative planning extinguished, any fundamental change in the university or any institution "(Kouzes and Posner 2005, p. 92).

The authors argue that routines destroy the vitality of organizations and causes it to atrophy, but some are essential for maintaining the operation definable, consistent, measurable and efficient.

As Kouzes and Posner (2005) is necessary detected when leaders routines are becoming unusable.

The third practice that mention Kouzes and Posner (2005) is:

c) Look around for encouragement and information: Kouzes and Posner (2005) demands for change can arise both from within and outside the company, leaders need to look around, be sensitive to external realities, talking with poderantes, customers and shareholders and keep in touch.

Commitment 2: Experiment and take risks and learn from mistakes that occur.

Kouzes and Posner (2005) assert that innovation involves taking risks, it is essential to health and organizational development, and that a leader should encourage his followers to move towards the unknown, rather than opt for a safe place, unlike a bureaucrat, is thus that the leaders know the skills and motivating tasks and set their poderantes goals higher than normal levels, but not so high in such a way that can be achieved without frustration.

Kouzes and Posner (2005) establish the following elements necessary to make the uncertainties in positive results

a) learn from the mistakes (and encourage others to do the same): Errors are valid if committed during processes innovation and leaders must encourage the learning these processes.

b) Promote and encourage psychological daring decision to take risks: stress is not related to disease, in many cases is associated with increased energy. In this way, handled the events with a positive attitude, there is greater possibility of transforming the complex events or leisure situations manageable.

Kouzes and Posner (2005) cited the following factors that contribute to creating an environment that favors the bold:

• Build commitment to offer more rewards than punishment.

• Build a sense of control over tasks to propose challenges, but always taking into account the level of skills people.

• Create an attitude of defiance by the idea that all change is full of possibilities.

The authors argue that people do not produce excellence when they feel alienated, threatened insignificant, this is how leaders have a tool to evaluate the ability of their constituents, and also gives them guidelines for a successful environment.

The third element to mention Kouzes and Posner (2005) to commit to this challenge is:

c) Make something happen: leaders in times of peace go deep inside and discover the true hidden gifts. Leaders must master change and uncertainty and know when it's time to act.


2.-INSPIRE A SHARED VISION.

Kouzes and Posner (2005) assert that leaders must imagine the ideal, the future is an ideal and unique image of how things in the future, the ideals refer to our preferences in terms of values, economic priorities, technological , political and social goals of our existence that we obtain in the long term, is the statement of the objectives that we seek to achieve through practical measures.

The authors argue that leaders need to be original, the views are unique and set us apart from everything else, this is what that awakens the interest of the people in the company, this fosters dignity and self esteem of people associated with the organization.

Moreover, these authors note that the principals want their leaders to have a vision or long-term orientation, should be able to project their goals over time.

Commitment 3. Imagine an uplifting and ennobling future.

As Kouzes and Posner (2005), this commitment involves the following practices by the leaders.

a) Imagine the ideal: the human mind can not remember numbers but feelings and images, is why the leaders in the training process its vision must rely on imaging process, the visions are mental images, impressions and perceptions.

b) Intuit's future: it refers to the ability to imagine, researchers have taken account of these activities argue that senior managers claim to have been guided by their intuition in important opinions.

To undertake this step, leaders must:

• Accept that experience is the best teacher: when presented with an unknown problem, we use past experience to help us solve, is how we compare and integrate the experience with the current situation.

• Use past knowledge: it is essential to understanding the past experiences in planning for the future, the future is built by extrapolation where the past is our way of looking at the future and incorporate the finer details to remember our past experiences, look at the past may increase the ability of leaders to be progressive.

• Exploiting this: the actions to be taken at the time when opportunities arise, you should take into account past experiences, but you should not miss opportunities, do not wait too long in the door and is at that moment that must rely on intuition.

• Implement the vision: the role of the visions is to focus human energy into a focus, if they are not clear people experience frustration, impatience, confusion, and avoid situations where you do not know how to act, is the task of leading maintain a clear vision, not to his followers can do but it will be some discomfort in them because the leader does not.

Commitment 4: Gather other around a common vision by appealing to their values, interests, hopes and dreams.

As Kouzes and Posner (2005) adequate vision fosters a positive change as it concentrates the energy of employees and consequently increases commitment to the company. To do commit to this challenge is critical in leaders:

a) Develop a sense of common destiny: to be effective in communicating their vision, when done properly, poderantes show: job satisfaction, motivation, commitment, loyalty , team spirit, clarity about the values \u200b\u200bof the organization, pride in the organization and productivity. However, this practice is applied less frequently and by the people is the most uncomfortable, you do not have the charisma to inspire a shared vision, this is what gives you energy to businesses.

b) Giving life to a vision the leader must have the ability to perceive the purpose of others, should be able to express their poderantes needs, develop a deep understanding of their desires, what people value and dreams, involves looking at attitudes and feelings of others and as the communication that takes place.

c) Demonstrate personal conviction: the lack of personal conviction is the main inhibitor to create a shared vision, there is no way that the leader can convince his constituents if he is not convinced himself, thus the poderantes consider it a hoax, the leader must be fully convinced.

3.-ENABLE OTHERS TO ACT.

Kouzes and Posner (2005) assert that there is a high correlation between leadership effectiveness and enable others to act.

Commitment 5 .- Foster collaboration by promoting cooperative goals and building trust.

As Kouzes and Posner (2005) Collaboration improves the performance performance rather than competition improves performance, prevents competition and more efficient use of resources, and has conflicting objectives to success.

These authors argue that the cooperative relations tend to increase the credibility of the leader as opposed to leaders who promote competitive relationships and enables them to increase customer satisfaction of their constituents and commitment to the organization and also asserts that individuals perform better when they cooperate.

Kouzes and Posner (2005) assert that leadership is more essential when it needs the cooperation of the principals to focus the diverse interests that can occur and to promote the creation of a sense of shared responsibility that allows for superior performance.

According to the authors to promote cooperation is essential in leaders:

a) develop cooperative goals, individuals must recognize they need to work together and need each other and that everyone should cooperate, and only achieved do the job the best way possible. To this end, leaders must: • Support

reciprocity.

• To maintain the interaction.

• Emphasize long-term results.

The second practice is essential to promote cooperation is:

b) looking for integrated solutions: it can solve many conflicts and allows people to develop a positive outlook to work together, this requires leaders to achieve:

• Concentrate on the benefits rather than losses.

• Sharing information and resources people can collaborate more actively when contribute to the objective of forming a whole from its parts.

• Getting support using alternative remuneration, it is necessary that the ideas generated profits or remuneration in poderantes alternative and that a particular idea is more likely to receive support something that is not concrete.

c) Build relationships based on trust, which is essential to promote collaboration, principals must trust their leaders. Kouzes and Posner (2005) citing research argue that trust is the critical factor to demonstrate satisfaction of individuals within your organization. The trust allows:

• Members to be displayed more willing to express feelings.

• Members experience more clarity on key issues and objectives of the group.

• Members seek more alternative paths.

• Members show greater influence on the results, more satisfaction, more motivation to implement decisions and a stronger bond as team management.

• Have more opportunities to be happy and psychologically adapted as well as the most effective leadership situations are those where each member trusts the other.

Commitment 6: Strengthen others by transferring power, choice, development of competition and the allocation of critical tasks and offering support. The best leaders

"They train others to have a sense of ownership and responsibility towards the success of his group" (Kouzes and Posner 2005, p.286) the poderantes who feel weak and want to play briefly leaving the organization.

As Kouzes and Posner (1997) is clear that to improve the chances of successful leaders must find practices that increase confidence, self-determination and efficiency.

Moreover, these authors propose that the leaders put their power at the service others, to achieve an objective to strengthen others to share power in the leadership and strengthen others is necessary: \u200b\u200b

a) Promote self-leadership: credible leaders rely on the paradox of power: become more powerful when delegated power when poderante leader and are willing to significantly influence each other, it raises the power to influence others and that sharing power with others demonstrate trust and respect for the abilities of others, on the other hand, people who feel that it can influence their leaders are more attached to them and committed to their work.

b) Provide alternatives: the best way for an organization is to use its potential power in the hands of people who do the work, say that providing alternatives and freedom on how to perform the work, improve the personal welfare of employees and increase their effectiveness.

As Kouzes and Posner (2005), leaders must perform tasks that promote the ability to decide in order to achieve higher levels of performance and less dependence, to achieve greater adaptability of organizations, leaders must create systems each more adaptable for which they should give more freedom, to promote freedom is given greater freedom to use the talent, training received and the experience, which provides better performance.

c) To develop competence: it is important for leaders to make investments to ensure the success of its employees who feel strong in developing their skills. On the other hand should be conducive to their poderantes the opportunity to apply these talents.

d) Assign critical tasks: the economic, environmental and social actions can affect the relative importance of the tasks and skills, the capacities of leaders and constituents should be developed around always looking ahead, on the other hand, are bent on poderantes when the success of the tasks is essential.

e) Provide visible support: to be powerful it must attract attention, is how leaders should strive to be visible as their poderantes for individual and group efforts to obtain recognition, on the other hand, leaders are more visible when they attempt that team members relate to persons outside the department, and important people.

4.-be models.

As Kouzes and Posner (2005) for leaders is important to express openly defend the principles and care consistent with the aspirations of its poderantes. They must defend securities representing a whole to be able to mobilize and unify the People should lead by example and based on a shared vision of what is expected.

Commitment 7: Set an example by behaving in ways consistent with shared values.

Kouzes and Posner For (2005) the proposal of the leader must be the company's proposal. They claim that when there is coherence between the leader's values \u200b\u200band the values \u200b\u200bof the organization gains are significant. Shared values:

• Foster a strong sense of personal efficacy.

• Promote high levels of loyalty to the company.

• Facilitate consensus on the main objectives of the organization.

• Encourage ethical behavior.

• Promote strong standards on the implementation of work and interest thereon.

• Reduce levels of job strain.

• Encourage pride in the company.

• Facilitate understanding of job expectations.

• Fosters teamwork and team spirit.

Moreover, these authors propose that when leaders seek consensus on shared values, the poderantes are more positive and create a sense of personal efficacy, while those who do not feel they waste their energy trying to figure out what is expected of them, claim that to commit to this challenge is important for leaders:

a) Clarify the values: according to Kouzes and Posner (2005) followers expect their leaders to defend their personal beliefs, otherwise, are considered contradictory if they change with each mode, values \u200b\u200bare what tells you how to act in certain situations, are models that influence other aspects of life.

b) poderantes unify around shared values: Kouzes and Posner (2005) say it is more difficult to obtain consensus for the values \u200b\u200bto prevail in an organization, involve employees to participate actively in the process, should agree with them and clear them.

Kouzes and Posner (2005) found in his research that people with greater clarity about their values \u200b\u200band those of the organization have higher levels of commitment to it. They claim to possess a clarity about personal values \u200b\u200bmay be more important to be clear about the values \u200b\u200bof the organization.

These authors claim that shared values \u200b\u200bpromote a large increase in work attitudes and performance because:

• Foster a strong sense of personal efficacy.

• Promote high levels of loyalty to the company.

• Facilitate consensus on the main objectives of the organization.

• Encourage ethical conduct.

• Promote strong norms about the diligence and interest.

• Reduce levels of job strain.

• Facilitate understanding of job expectations.

• Foster teamwork and team spirit.

The third practice is essential to commit to this challenge is:

c) Focus: acts speak louder than words, Kouzes and Posner (2005) claim that it is important to note that employees if they want be productive employees should give a good example, setting high performance standards and practice what they preach, so such acts become daily activities.

Commitment 8: Get small wins that promote steady progress and generate commitment.

As Kouzes and Posner (2005) this challenge requires leadership by the following practices:

a) The big change is a process of small wins: the leaders are more effective as Kouzes and Posner (2005) decompose processes in small achievable steps.

b) Lead the process of small wins, as Kouzes and Posner (2005) leaders who set their goals around small wins, they make their constituents feel successful and continue to show greater interest in getting wins and generates a tablet personal and group. Furthermore, effective leaders are able to change people through:

• Mobilize to act quickly.

• Experiencing continuously.

• Reduce items to its essence: the urgency of the work makes people only have the time to focus on specific topics.

• Act with urgency relates to perform all tasks as a matter of immediate action.

• Maintain the commitment, people must be committed permanently. 5.-


provide encouragement.

Commitment 9: To recognize individual contributions to the success of any project.

As Kouzes and Posner (2005), leaders who recognize individual contributions, manage to increase internal motivation of each individual, recognize these contributions is achieved by performing the following guidelines:

a) Build self-confidence through high expectations : successful leaders have high expectations both of themselves and their constituents.

As Kouzes and Posner (2005) form the framework expectations within which individuals adjust the reality is very often look at what we expect to see rather than what actually occurs, this phenomenon is known as the "Pygmalion Effect" or "self-fulfilling prophecy."

In this way, authors say it is if the leaders have high expectations about what people should achieve, through treatment, promote individuals to strengthen their own confidence and enable them to get more of what they had imagined.

b ) Linking performance to rewards: Kouzes and Posner (2005) assert that individuals tend to repeat behaviors that are rewarded, avoid behaviors that are punished and tend to forget those who do not produce neither result.

"If you want to draw attention to the quality should reward only those who meet the standards set. Those who show poor performance in this area should not be rewarded until they conform to the norm "(Kouzes and Posner 2005, p. 419).

Moreover, as the authors to link rewards to performance, it is important for leaders:

• Try to let people know what is expected of them.

• Provide feedback on performance of employees. • Reward only

those who meet established guidelines.

The third fundamental practice to commit to this challenge is:

c) Use a variety of rewards: According to Kouzes and Posner (2005) is important for leaders to use both extrinsic rewards offered by the organization as intrinsic rewards such as cards, because the organizations offer a limited range of formal rewards.

Intrinsic rewards, according to the authors, serve as a powerful motivator, as they provide a sense of achievement and the thrill of creating these occur immediately after the effort of the individual. Moreover, the rewards extrinsic and intrinsic must be combined properly, it is not always the first cause an addictive effect as is commonly thought.

d) Be positive and optimistic: Kouzes and Posner (2005) assert that there is a difference in performance, stress levels and long-term health of the type of leadership. Leaders who provide a positive sense, encourage their followers to give the best of themselves, and motivate them to make the impossible possible.

Commitment 10: Celebrate team accomplishments regularly.

As Kouzes and Posner (2005) celebrations are processes in which rewards people and shared the excitement of their success. Is important that they exist four elements:

a) Outlining the achievements with joy: According to the authors, it is essential to clarify what is sometimes held, moreover, these celebrations should involve real success stories that are consistent with the values \u200b\u200bof the organization, so that employees feel encouraged to try to achieve them, this factor is essential to maintain credibility.

b) Make public ceremonies, according to the authors, public ceremonies, give visibility to the acts, and therefore generate greater accountability, moreover, reinforce the commitment to core values \u200b\u200band give to show that the leader is serious about the importance of complying with the principles.

Kouzes and Posner (2005) state that if the spontaneous ceremonies are often more meaningful and memorable, as are appropriate as they produce is still fresh when the thrill of victory.

c) To participate in person, according to these authors, leaders have many opportunities to celebrate, celebrations are to focus attention on the core values \u200b\u200bthat leaders personally join in the celebrations generates solidarity and commitment that the poderante feels supported and is working as a team to meet the challenges.

d) Develop social support networks: the authors claim, that by the celebrations, leaders create social support networks, as people gather around a common purpose and when does that team members interact at levels beyond the professional, begin to worry about by others, as well as celebrate the achievements allows to strengthen interest and everyone feels included in the team, let alone believe they belong to something larger and more significant, this increases the motivation to achieve.

Kouzes and Posner (2005) state that on the other hand, to defend the social support networks facilitate interaction, both formal and informal, is at this point that break down the hierarchical barriers, and for the exchange of ideas, encouragement with people at another level.

Source: Kousez James and Barry Posner. (2005). "The challenge of leadership. How to get extraordinary achievements permanently." Buenos Aires: Granica.

How Much Tattoo Cost In Perth

fish


conjurer
am the fish on Sundays.

Friday, May 13, 2011

Direct Rewards Platinum Discover

Chile, to focus (1) Hiroshima

We are tenacious and we knelt on the sand, facing the sea. We see it. Miriam plays it with a stick we found when we came over here. Some are bored, just do not see, and instead watch giant sea ice. In the background are distinguished heads and geometric solid ice floes.
We walked all night moved, not certainty, but the fatigue of real things. About four inches of sand, in that vague space that is neither sea nor shore, in the space in which the foam is deposited in water and guess which bottom depression, erosion continuous particle moves, there, six inches or eight inches, was the narrow strip of meat, the color becomes gray boiled meat, but also half pink, floating in a swinging like swings. Miriam touched him with the stick and its edges were peeling threads of flesh.
dawning on our faces felt cold but not cold because it stood, the narrow strip on which was deposited in the sun, a heat that we accommodated between the body and sleeve. Dawn over Chile. From there we listened to the awakening of the people, rose the sound of cars and machines, the shrill voice of women, laughter, movement of cups cafes. We did not know how, say, we never knew how to access the raw center.
They rose, Miriam and I followed. I know


Valparaíso and painted walls. E winter.

Monday, May 9, 2011

Hydraulic Storage Instructions









script fragment Hiroshima Mon Amour, Marguerite Duras, directed by Alain Resnais film

A man's voice, dull and quiet, recitative, announces
EL. - You have seen nothing in Hiroshima. Nothing.
A woman's voice, very breathy, likewise mate, a reading voice recitative without
score, he replied:
IT. - I've seen everything. Everything.
Then again heard the voice of women, quiet and dull recitative also:
IT. - For example, the hospital I have seen. That's for sure.
There is a hospital in Hiroshima. How could I fail to see it?
EL. - You have not seen any hospital in Hiroshima. You have seen nothing in Hiroshima.
IT. - Four times in the museum ...
EL. - What museum in Hiroshima?
IT. - Four times in the museum in Hiroshima. I've seen people walking. The whole world
walks pensively through the middle of the photographs, reconstructions, in the absence of
otherwise, through pictures, photographs, reconstructions, in the absence of other
thing, the explanations in the absence of anything else.
Four times in the museum in Hiroshima.
He referred to the people. I looked in my turn, thoughtfully, iron. Iron
burned. Broken iron, iron that has become vulnerable as meat. I saw clusters of capsules
Who would have thought? Human skins floating survivors, their suffering
still fresh. Piedras. Burnt stones. Shattered stones. Scalps
anonymous women in Hiroshima were whole, falls, by the
morning upon waking. I
had heat in the Place de la Paz. Ten thousand degrees, in the Plaza de la Paz. I know. The temperature of the sun
in the Plaza de la Paz. How would not know ...? The grass is very simple ...

EL. - You have seen nothing in Hiroshima, nothing.
IT. - The reconstructions have been most severely.
films have been most severely.
The illusion is very simple, so perfect for tourists to cry.
You can always make fun, but what else can a tourist but
just that, mourn?
ELLA .- [... but mourn just to support this abominable spectacle between
all. And leave it sad enough not to lose my mind.]
IT. - [The people staying there, thinking. And with no irony whatsoever,
can say that the chances of making people think they are always good. And the monuments,
that sometimes a smile, however, are the best excuses for those occasions
...]
IT. - [For those times ... thinking. Generally, it is true, when
presents a chance to think ... that luxury ... not think anything.
What the show does not mean that others, who are supposed to be thinking
is encouraging.]
IT. - The fate of Hiroshima always made me mourn. Always.
EL. - No.
EL. - What was I going to make you mourn?
IT. - I saw the news.
the second day, the story goes, I have not invented it myself, since the second day,
certain animal species resurfaced from the depths of the earth and ashes
.
dogs were photographed.
Forever.
I've seen.
I've seen the news.
I've seen.
From the first day.
the second day.
the third day.
EL (interrupting). - You have seen nothing. Nothing.
IT. -... the fifteenth day too.
IT. - I have not invented nothing.
EL. - You've invented everything.
IT. - Nothing.
In the same way that there is this illusion in love, the illusion of being able
not ever forget, I also had the illusion to Hiroshima would never forget. Like
in love.


yesterday I saw this movie. This could perhaps have the audio in French to understand the strength and beauty of the first sentences, spelled between the images of Hiroshima in the middle of two disparate bodies moving slowly as if they thought of ten thousand square degrees, ten thousand square degrees, as if each were, glued to the other, far away, everyone in the place that was then.
There, every denial of rightful view an image, but is obliterated as an image of itself, and truncated at the source. The denial shows that there is, despite it look shows that the surface of images, under which it must be, we believe, the experience of Hiroshima, the experience of war, no more than language is removed. The language does not return, do not restore the images. However, it is a "glare" of reality. It is not seen in Hiroshima, someone, she begins to update the story, its history, an experience of war. What is returned? There is an ever-present threat, forgetting. But there is another willing to listen, there is another that looks and love and becomes or is made by IT that counts, madly, feverishly, which restores while forgotten.
I'm also thinking of something I read, emancipated viewer of Jacques Rancière. There Rancière question "intolerable image", ie the images that we put explicitly to the horror, mutilation, disease, famine, war, etc.. and discusses the effect these images have on viewers. If before it was expected to collaborate performatively on the public, making them become aware of a situation and calling for action, now is not expected that. The important thing, says Rancière, is not the adequacy or inadequacy of the images but the device within which they are placed. How does the formal context-sensitive and that these images are inserted otherwise prepared to be observed?
If I understood I think maybe the test images "unacceptable" Hiroshima (very unbearable at times, or at least to me, I'm pretty weak for such things), inserted in the device of another story, more minimal, told almost all over the skin of another person, it helps to "see" differently. Anyway I do not think that serves to change too many things I do not think, unfortunately, that has mobilized to action to the 14 people who met yesterday in the teachings of the three frogs and we were much the same way we came, but perhaps it shows another way to see or at least recognize what we see.
I'll take questions and that feeling when you first finish a song, suspended.

Wednesday, May 4, 2011

2004 Fishmaster Jon Boat

Chile's your name if this is not

(Chile do not know anything)
1-A piece of meat, a steak undefined borders narrow, pink to gray, baked on the edges and raw in the middle, spewing warm to cold. The piece of meat is moving slowly on the sea ice that reaches the first light of morning.
2-Someone who does not return.
3-A group of boys who read poetry in a house where two sisters live. With a lie down with the other, no. 4-
breakneck tongue like hail.
5-The desert and a full name: Atacama.
6-A woman who hides in the bathroom at school and stays locked up for weeks as will be the coup.
7-Songs not know. 8-Another mouth
rampant and magenta. Reports of sexuality and politics.
9-another sea.
10-The miniature replica of the Great Wall of China, dissolved and eaten away by white fauna of the hills.

decalogues To read more about Chile, click here .

Monday, May 2, 2011

Removing Popcorn Oil From Clothing

III Edition of the City of Science, Technology and Innovation 2011 "Dr. Humberto Fernández-Morán"

Assists, notes, comments, questions and supports children
doing science in the Third National Award for Science, Technology and Innovation 2011. PB
MINCI building, Caracas - Venezuela.


Happy start to the week
innovative / entrepreneurial:

Then I inform an event of particular importance since it is an initiative that fosters scientific research among children in our elementary schools. Call it science since childhood.
have to see these initiatives as a phase-oriented long term, to contribute to the endogenous development of the Science, Technology and Innovation!

I commented that I was invited to participate as a juror in this third edition of this important event:


The Standing Committee on Economics, Finance and Endogenous Development Council of the Bolivarian Libertador Municipality, invites the general public the Third Edition Municipal Award for Science, Technology and Innovation 2011 "Dr. Humberto Fernandez-Moran.

This Committee is chaired by Councilman Fernando García and has everything an aspiring team, as the Foundation Innovargh to contribute to the promotion of Science, Technology and Innovation in the Bolivarian Libertador municipality.

Municipal Prize consists of five (05) categories, addressed to: Primary, Secondary, Higher and Professional People Ingenio. It is also planned delivery of the Prize for Scientific Excellence. Work and energy shows and live here, is an experience well worth living.

All these proposals are framed in our National Simon Bolivar Project and guidelines on science, technology and innovation issued by the President Hugo Rafael Chavez Frias. With this humble work, we intend to plant science through this experience that our children live, children, youth, communities and the general public.

One of the cases will be showing is the proposal of a 11 year old girl at a school in Sucre Parish concern product for people who fall asleep on the Metro and will create a device that is activated by the sound of the train doors to alert the user.

Join us, will live an experience you'll never forget, by the spectacular energy that permeates the place to expose children and youth. This will not compromise in any way to give anything.

It is noteworthy that all the participating works will be exhibited and explained by the authors in Science and Technology Fair, which will take place in the PB of the headquarters of the Ministry of Popular Power for Science, Technology and Industry Intermedias y Telecomunicaciones. Plaza de los Pueblos y Saberes. Esquina del Chorro, durante los dias jueves 02 y viernes 03 de junio de 2011, en horario de 9:00 am a 4:30 pm institución que nos ha prestado un invaluable apoyo.

En esta Feria, el Jurado Calificador procederá a la evaluación in situ, de los trabajos participantes de todas las categorías presentes, a través de un baremo diseñado por el Comité Organizador para tal fin.

Para mayor información, le invitamos a contáctanos por los siguientes medios:

Teléfonos: Oficina: 0212-4810484. Lic. Daysi Darias 04141387458 e Ing. Luis Zapata 04142107777.

Email: sugerenciacomision@yahoo.es

www.infopremiomunicipal.blogspot.com
our blog and Facebook Social Network: "Award Municipal Science and Technology"